When the next $50 billion hurricane strikes Florida, the question is: Who’s going to pay for it? While many Floridians expect insurers to cover the damage, the reality is a bit more complicated.
Insurers can falter, premiums may fall short and, ultimately, the financial burden shifts to homeowners and taxpayers. Florida’s insurance crisis exposes the unsustainable expectation that we can build in high-risk areas and count on others to pick up the tab when disaster strikes.
Florida’s unique climate and growth patterns make it especially vulnerable to hurricanes, flooding and storm surges. This has driven up insurance costs, but high premiums are simply a reflection of real risk. Suppressing these premiums with subsidies or caps gives consumers false security, encouraging building in unsafe zones. This cycle burdens our insurance system, exposes more people to financial loss and promotes a fragile market.
In any open market, price signals risk – and when these signals are distorted, it’s like taking away a warning light. Proper pricing not only discourages risky development but also promotes safe and sustainable practices by directing homeowners to safer, less vulnerable locations.
Government intervention often aims to make insurance more accessible, but in practice, it exacerbates risk. Artificially low premiums lure people to high-risk areas, insulate them from real costs, and create what’s known as moral hazard – the tendency to take on more risk because someone else is sharing the burden. When government programs make it cheaper to live in flood zones, they unintentionally encourage risky building and erode incentives for mitigation measures like storm-resistant construction.
Comments